caddysetr.blogg.se

1. #Olympus viewer 3 ready for batch processing manual
2. #Olympus viewer 3 ready for batch processing pro

Throw in the fact that an iPhone 11 nannies in a ton of computational stuff you'd have to do independently in post on RAW files from an O-M10, and it can look that much better, particularly when it comes to stacking features, such as HDR/Night mode or long-exposure simulation from live photos. 12MP (iPhone 11) isn't that large of a resolution difference. And while your big 12-40 is an f/2.8 pro-quality zoom, the lens on your standard ("wide") camera on an iPhone 11 is f/1.8. And sensor size only means so much in certain shooting circumstances. A lot of camera sensor tech and computational imaging advances can happen in five years. You're comparing a 2014 micro four-thirds camera to a 2019 iPhone. The image quality may not be that different. Have you looked at this and is your experience different?

#Olympus viewer 3 ready for batch processing manual

I understand the advantages of interchangable lenses and far greater manual control). I can find no clear difference in photo quality between a micro 4/3 camera and an iPhone 11.My question has gotten lost in the words and discussion. And in that use-case, I cannot prove for myself that the image coming from the Oly is better than the one coming from the iPhone. So that is the use case I am most interested in. I might purposely underexpose a litte, I might pay attention to the f-stop for depth of field, I definitely note the shutter speed. In practice, even when I am taking photos that I hope will be great and ready for enlarging and hanging on the wall, I don't use many "features" of the camera. But in the common range of say 24-160 equiv zoom, I can't prove that one is better than the other. a 300mm equiv zoom lens) then the Oly is an easy winner. After all I am using a fairly expensive "Pro" Olympus short zoom in this particular example. I realize that my Olympus OM-10 Mk1 has manual control ahead of the iPhone and also that I can use other lenses. If I enlarge them a lot looking for details neither one is necessarily better. (Admitedly I am a newby at the processing part) Yes the images look different but not better. I've tried processing them with MacOS Photos and with On1.

I've tried looking at the images without any processing.

#Olympus viewer 3 ready for batch processing pro

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO Lens shooting raw or jpeg, Olympus OM-10 Mk1 body.So, I want to know - how much better are my images? Why am I doing this? When I travel I take my Oly and a few lenses with me and as time goes by I've gotten less patient carrying the gear around. I am trying to prove to myself how much better the images are on the Olympus and I am not seeing it. The Olympus has a far larger sensor and a big glass lens.